Divorce Defenders

Sleepaway Camp During Divorce

Who Chooses the Camp, Receives Updates, and Handles Emergencies?


Contested Divorce Attorney in California

A child has been accepted to sleepaway camp. The deposit is due, cabins are filling, and the enrollment form asks for one parent to be listed first. For parents living in separate homes, those ordinary details can expose questions the custody order never answered.

In California, a parent does not necessarily have sole authority to choose a camp simply because it falls during that parent’s summer parenting time. California Courts lists summer camp among the important decisions that legal custody may cover. The exact answer depends on the custody order: who has legal custody, which decisions require mutual consent, what the parenting schedule allows, and whether either parent’s access to the child’s information is restricted.

Before paying a nonrefundable deposit, parents should compare three things: the custody order, the camp paperwork, and the plan for an emergency.

Sleepaway Camp and Custody: Quick Answers

Common question
Short answer
Who chooses the sleepaway camp?
The custody order controls. When parents share legal custody, camp enrollment may require consultation or mutual consent, depending on the order’s wording.
Can a parent enroll the child because camp falls during that parent’s time?
Not automatically. Parenting time and legal decision-making are separate, and enrollment cannot override the other parent’s court-ordered time.
Should both parents receive camp updates?
Usually both should be listed when the order permits access. Camp systems may require a direct request, and a protective order can restrict what information is shared.
Who handles a medical emergency?
The camp should follow its emergency procedures and the authorizations on file. The parent reached first may need to respond immediately and should notify the other parent as required by the custody order.
Who decides about follow-up treatment or bringing the child home?
Once the immediate emergency has passed, the custody order may require both parents to consult about nonemergency care, medication changes, or ending the camp stay early.
Who pays for camp?
Legal custody does not decide payment. The parents should check their order or written agreement before committing to tuition and related expenses.
What if the parents cannot agree before camp begins?
They can try to resolve the terms in writing, use mediation if appropriate, or seek a court order instead of leaving the dispute to camp staff.

Start With the Custody Order, Not the Camp Calendar

Legal custody and physical custody answer different questions. Legal custody concerns authority over important decisions involving a child’s health, education, and welfare. Physical custody determines where the child lives and when each parent has parenting time.

Under California Family Code section 3003, parents with joint legal custody share the right and responsibility to make decisions about their child’s health, education, and welfare. California Courts expressly includes summer camp among the important decisions that legal custody may cover.

That means a parent should not assume, “Camp falls during my week, so the choice is mine.” The dates may come out of one parent’s scheduled time, while the decision to enroll may still be governed by joint legal custody.

The wording of the order matters. Family Code section 3083 directs courts issuing joint legal custody orders to identify when both parents’ consent is required. In other circumstances, either parent may be allowed to act alone, but not in a way that conflicts with the physical custody order unless the court has authorized it.

Read the actual order for provisions addressing:

  • summer camp or extracurricular activities;
  • out-of-state or international travel;
  • vacation notice and itinerary requirements;
  • medical decisions and emergency care;
  • interference with the other parent’s scheduled time; and
  • tie-breaking authority when the parents cannot agree.

If the order specifically requires joint agreement for camp or extracurricular activities, enrollment should not be treated as final until both parents have agreed. If the order gives one parent sole legal custody or final authority over that category, the analysis may be different—but the camp dates still cannot simply erase the other parent’s court-ordered time.

Is This a Camp Choice or a Parenting-Time Change?

Sometimes it is both.

A five-day program that fits entirely within one parent’s vacation period presents a different scheduling problem from a seven-week camp that consumes much of the other parent’s summer time. Other details can also change the significance of the decision:

  • Is the camp in California, another state, or another country?
  • Will the child miss an exchange, birthday, or planned family trip?
  • Does the program involve substantial cost or specialized equipment?
  • Are there health, medication, disability, religious, or dietary considerations?
  • Is this a familiar camp or the child’s first extended stay away from both homes?
  • Does the child actually want to attend?

These questions are not a substitute for the order. They help identify which parts of the order are implicated. A disagreement may concern legal decision-making, parenting time, travel, cost, or several of those issues at once.

The Enrollment Form Should Reflect Two Homes

Many camp systems are designed around one household. They ask for a “primary parent,” one mailing address, and a short emergency-contact list. That software layout does not decide either parent’s legal rights.

When the order permits both parents to receive information, the camp file should be set up accordingly. Parents can ask the camp to include:

  • both names, phone numbers, email addresses, and home addresses;
  • the correct custody and pickup restrictions;
  • the child’s complete medical and medication information;
  • both parents on routine announcement, photo, incident, and travel-delay lists;
  • an agreed order for emergency calls;
  • authorized local contacts if neither parent can be reached; and
  • a copy or relevant excerpt of the custody order when the camp needs it.

Family Code section 3025 says a parent cannot be denied access to records and information about a minor child merely because that parent is not the custodial parent. Even so, parents should not assume that updates will automatically reach both homes. The camp may need a direct written request, its portal may allow only one default login, and a custody or protective order may lawfully restrict access in a particular case.

There is a special safety exception worth taking seriously. California Family Code section 6323.5 allows certain restraining orders to limit a parent’s access to information held by organizations providing children’s recreational activities, expressly including summer camps. If such an order exists, give the camp the operative order and follow it precisely. Do not use a general “keep both parents informed” approach when a court has imposed a restriction.

Decide Who Gets Which Updates Before Drop-Off

Not every camp message carries the same weight. Parents can reduce confusion by separating routine updates from decisions.

Routine messages may include packing reminders, cabin assignments, bus delays, weekly newsletters, or ordinary photos. Both parents can usually be added when the order allows it and the camp’s system supports it.

An incident report is different. If a child is injured, becomes ill, is repeatedly asking to leave, or faces a disciplinary problem, both parents may need prompt information even if only one is designated as the camp’s first call. The first-call designation should be a communication plan, not a device for excluding the other parent.

Then there are decisions: approving a nonemergency medical procedure, changing medication, extending the stay, authorizing an off-site trip, or withdrawing the child. The authority to make those decisions comes from the custody order and applicable law—not from whichever name appears first in the camp portal.

What Happens if the Camp Calls With an Emergency?

Camp staff need a usable answer in the moment. “Call both parents and wait until they agree” may not be realistic when a child needs immediate care.

California’s standard Joint Legal Custody Attachment, form FL-341(E), distinguishes selection of health professionals from emergency situations. A practical camp plan should therefore identify:

  1. who the camp calls first;
  2. how quickly it should call the second parent;
  3. which nearby adult may respond if neither parent is available;
  4. where the child should receive urgent care if there is time to choose;
  5. current insurance, allergy, medication, and physician information; and
  6. how the parent who receives the call will notify the other parent.

The first parent reached may need to respond to an immediate situation. That does not necessarily give that parent unilateral authority over every follow-up decision. Once the immediate danger has passed, nonemergency treatment, a medication change, an early pickup, or a decision to end the camp stay may again require consultation under the custody order.

Parents should also tell the camp about any medical-consent terms in the order. A camp director should not have to interpret a lengthy family-law judgment during an emergency; the instructions supplied to the camp should be accurate, short, and consistent with the controlling order.

Who Pays the Camp Fee?

Authority to choose a camp and responsibility to pay for it are separate issues. Joint legal custody does not, by itself, decide whether the parents split tuition, travel, equipment, spending money, or cancellation charges.

Look for provisions concerning extracurricular expenses, agreed activities, childcare, summer programs, or reimbursement. If the order is silent, parents should settle the cost question in writing before anyone pays a nonrefundable amount. Enrollment should not be used to create a financial obligation first and seek agreement later.

A Better Camp Agreement Fits on One Page

Parents do not need to renegotiate their entire parenting plan to address one summer program. A short written agreement can identify:

  • the camp, location, session dates, and transportation plan;
  • whose parenting time is affected and whether makeup time applies;
  • tuition and additional costs;
  • both parents’ access to the portal, reports, photos, and staff;
  • emergency-call order and medical information;
  • authority for nonemergency decisions;
  • pickup rights and approved third parties; and
  • what happens if the child wants or needs to come home early.

If the parents reach an informal agreement, they should understand whether their existing order requires a formal modification. California Courts notes that detailed custody orders are easier to follow and enforce, particularly when they address vacation notice and joint decision-making. When the disagreement cannot be resolved, a parent can seek an order or modification rather than forcing the camp to choose between conflicting instructions.

The Question to Resolve Before Camp Begins

Sleepaway camp should give a child the chance to enjoy the experience—not make the child carry messages between two homes. The useful question is not which parent can get a name into the registration system first. It is whether the custody order, camp file, and emergency plan all tell the adults the same thing.

Prepare for Sleepaway Camp With Divorce Defenders

A summer at camp should not begin with uncertainty about who can enroll the child, receive important updates, or respond when something goes wrong. Addressing those questions before drop-off can give parents, camp staff, and the child a clearer plan for the weeks ahead.

At Divorce Defenders, Katherine Cohan helps parents understand how California custody orders apply to summer programs, travel, medical decisions, information access, and parenting-time conflicts. If a proposed camp raises questions about shared legal custody or affects the other parent’s scheduled time, contact the Beverly Hills office to arrange a confidential consultation and clarify the plan before the camp session begins.

This article provides general information about California family law and is not legal advice. Custody orders and safety restrictions differ. A parent should obtain advice about the terms of the order governing their own family.

Divorce Defenders

  • PHONE

    +1 310 777 8838

  • HOURS

    Mon-Fri: 8am – 9pm

  • ADDRESS

    9454 Wilshire Blvd. Penthouse Suites Beverly Hills, CA 90212

  • EMAIL

    info@divorcedefenders.com

Links

Location

© 2026 The Law Offices of Katherine Cohan, APLC. All rights reserved.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, and contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Call Now Button