Divorce Defenders

Nannies, Drivers, and House Managers Across Two Homes

Who Gives the Instructions?

Two parents and a household manager reviewing a child custody schedule while a child stands nearby.

The driver receives one pickup address from a parent and a different address from the house manager. The nanny is told to limit screen time in one home and to follow another routine in the other. A school administrator calls because two adults have given conflicting pickup instructions—and neither is the child’s parent.

Household staff can make life across two homes run smoothly, but only when the chain of instruction is clear. In California, a nanny, driver, or house manager does not gain custody or independent decision-making authority by managing a child’s schedule. The custody order remains controlling. Parents retain legal authority, while staff carry out the tasks properly delegated to them.

The practical solution is not to make every household identical. It is to define which instructions travel with the child, which rules belong to one home, and what staff should do when the parents disagree.

Household Staff and Custody: Quick Answers

Common question
Short answer
Who directs the nanny during a parent’s custody time?
The parent responsible for that period generally directs routine care in that home, subject to the custody order and any joint instructions.
Can a house manager change the parenting schedule?
No. Staff may coordinate an agreed schedule, but they cannot modify a custody order or decide which parent receives the child.
What should a driver do after receiving conflicting pickup instructions?
The driver should not choose between parents. Follow the controlling written schedule and approved contact protocol, then obtain clarification from the authorized parent or parents.
Can both parents give instructions to a shared nanny?
Yes, but overlapping authority should be organized in writing. Separate household preferences should not conflict with custody, safety, medical, school, or exchange requirements.
Who gives permission for medical care?
The custody order and applicable authorization determine who can consent. Staff should have emergency contacts and written medical instructions, not assumed authority.
Can staff share information from one home with the other?
Share child-related information required by the order or agreed protocol. Staff should not become investigators, witnesses on demand, or messengers for adult disputes.
Should staff receive the entire custody order?
Usually only the operative terms they need. Pickup limits, schedules, travel restrictions, medical instructions, and safety orders must be communicated accurately.

Staff Can Carry Instructions, Not Parental Authority

California law separates legal custody from physical custody. Family Code section 3003 defines joint legal custody as both parents sharing the right and responsibility to make decisions involving a child’s health, education, and welfare. Family Code section 3004 addresses joint physical custody, under which each parent has significant periods of physical custody.

Neither role transfers to a household employee merely because that person handles the details. A nanny may prepare medication, drive to therapy, supervise homework, or communicate with a coach. A house manager may update calendars and arrange transportation. Those are delegated tasks. They do not make the staff member the parent, legal custodian, or tie-breaker.

This distinction matters when a routine task becomes a decision. Driving a child to an already approved activity is different from enrolling the child in a new program. Giving medication according to written instructions is different from changing the dose. Entering confirmed dates into a shared calendar is different from moving a custody exchange.

Separate Routine Household Rules From Major Decisions

Two homes will not operate exactly alike. Different meal times, chores, screen limits, bedtime routines, and ways of organizing school materials do not necessarily create a custody problem.

Staff need to know which category an instruction falls into:

  • ordinary meal and snack routines;
  • household chores;
  • room organization;
  • screen-time limits;
  • local transportation preferences; and
  • bedtime routines that do not conflict with health or school obligations.
  • the parenting-time and exchange schedule;
  • custody and pickup restrictions;
  • school enrollment or withdrawal;
  • selection of health or mental health providers;
  • medication and treatment instructions;
  • travel requiring notice or consent;
  • approved extracurricular commitments; and
  • protective or restraining-order terms.

The exact division depends on the custody order. Under Family Code section 3083, a joint legal custody order should specify when mutual consent is required. In other circumstances, a parent may be permitted to act alone, but not in a way that conflicts with the physical custody order unless the court has authorized it.

Staff should not be asked to interpret that boundary from memory or from competing text messages.

Who Gives Instructions During Each Parent’s Time?

For ordinary care, the parent exercising parenting time will often set the routine in that home. A shared nanny may therefore receive one set of household preferences on Monday and another on Thursday.

That can work if the differences are ordinary and the handoff is clear. It becomes unworkable when both parents attempt to supervise the same employee at the same moment. For example:

  • one parent directs the nanny to take the child to practice while the other cancels it;
  • a parent changes the pickup location during the other parent’s time;
  • the house manager alters an exchange after speaking with only one parent;
  • one home instructs the driver not to release the child to someone listed as authorized by the order; or
  • a parent asks the nanny to report on the other household rather than the child’s care.

A written chain of command can identify who directs routine tasks during each custody period and which subjects require confirmation from both parents. If one parent employs the staff member and the other parent uses that person’s services, the employment arrangement should also state who may assign work. Custody authority and authority as an employer are related practical questions, but they are not the same legal issue.

Shared Staff Need One Source for the Confirmed Schedule

Parallel calendars invite mistakes. Shared staff should have one designated source for confirmed parenting time, exchanges, school transportation, activities, and travel.

The calendar should show:

  • which parent is responsible for each period;
  • exchange time and location;
  • the adult authorized to transport the child;
  • school, camp, appointment, and activity details;
  • changes that both parents have confirmed when confirmation is required;
  • emergency contacts; and
  • any instruction that expires on a particular date.

Access to the calendar should not mean authority to edit every field. A driver may need read-only access. A house manager may enter logistical details but require parent approval before changing custody time. A nanny may record an appointment without having permission to choose the provider.

The goal is a reliable operating record—not another place for the parents to conduct their dispute.

Pickup Instructions Must Match the Custody Order

School pickup, camp release, airport transportation, and custody exchanges are areas where vague delegation creates real risk.

California Courts recommends giving relevant custody terms to third parties who need them and specifically notes that a daycare may need a copy of an order identifying who can pick up the child. The same practical principle applies when a nanny or driver participates in an exchange.

Staff should receive a current written list covering:

  • authorized drivers and pickup adults;
  • adults who are prohibited from receiving the child;
  • identification requirements;
  • exact exchange locations and times;
  • whether curbside, school, or third-party exchanges are required;
  • what to do when a parent is late;
  • who can approve a same-day change; and
  • when staff must stop and call rather than proceed.

An outdated staff memo cannot override a newer court order. When the parents give conflicting directions, staff should preserve the child’s immediate safety, avoid improvising a new exchange, and use the agreed escalation contacts.

Medical Instructions Should Travel With the Child

Medication, allergies, therapy exercises, dietary restrictions, and emergency information should not reset at the front door of each home.

Staff who may be responsible for the child should have only the information needed for their role, including:

  • current medication name, dose, and schedule;
  • allergy and emergency-response instructions;
  • physician and insurance information;
  • each parent’s current contact details;
  • authorization forms required by the provider or activity; and
  • the person or people authorized to make nonemergency decisions.

The standard California Joint Legal Custody Attachment, form FL-341(E), distinguishes the selection of health professionals from emergency situations. A staff protocol should do the same: identify what the nanny or house manager may do immediately, whom to call, and what must return to the parent or parents for a decision.

A nanny who follows a written allergy plan is carrying out care. A nanny who independently changes treatment is stepping beyond that role.

Child Information Is Not Household Intelligence

Shared staff naturally observe both homes. That access can become damaging when a parent treats the employee as a source of evidence about the other household. A child-focused communication log may appropriately record:
  • meals, sleep, medication, and symptoms;
  • homework and school notices;
  • injuries or behavioral incidents;
  • belongings moving between homes;
  • appointment results that the parents are entitled to receive; and
  • transportation delays.
It should not become a running account of a parent’s guests, purchases, private conversations, or personal habits. Staff should not be directed to photograph rooms, search devices, record conversations, or question the child for litigation purposes. Apart from the privacy and employment concerns that conduct may create, it places the employee inside the parents’ conflict and can change the child’s sense of safety in both homes.

Protective Orders Require a Different Protocol

The usual goal of keeping both parents informed does not apply without qualification when a court has restricted access.

Family Code section 6323.5 permits certain restraining orders to limit access to a child’s records and information held by schools, health providers, daycare providers, and other covered organizations. A family may also have orders governing exchanges, addresses, communication, or contact through third parties.

Staff who need to implement those restrictions should receive accurate operative instructions. They should not be shown confidential material unrelated to their work, and they should never be asked to create an informal exception because one parent says the restriction is unnecessary today.

A Two-Home Staff Protocol Should Answer Ten Questions

Parents using shared household staff can reduce conflict by answering these questions in writing:
  1. Who employs and supervises each staff member?
  2. Who gives routine instructions during each parent’s time?
  3. Which decisions require confirmation from both parents?
  4. What calendar is the official source for custody and activities?
  5. Who may edit that calendar?
  6. Who may pick up, drive, or receive the child?
  7. What is the emergency and medical protocol?
  8. What child-related information should staff share with each parent?
  9. What should staff do after receiving conflicting instructions?
  10. Who is the escalation contact when the parents cannot be reached or cannot agree?
The protocol should match the custody order and the staff member’s employment agreement. If the parents agree to change custody or parenting-time terms, California Courts explains how an agreement can be submitted as a court order. A household operations memo alone does not modify the court’s order.

Keep Household Staff Out of the Parenting Dispute

Well-defined roles allow a nanny to care for the child, a driver to transport safely, and a house manager to coordinate logistics without asking any of them to decide which parent is right. The most effective protocol is not the one with the most rules. It is the one that tells staff what they may do, what they must not decide, and whom to contact before a conflict reaches the child.

Keep Household Staff Out of the Parenting Dispute

Well-defined roles allow a nanny to care for the child, a driver to transport safely, and a house manager to coordinate logistics without asking any of them to decide which parent is right. The most effective protocol is not the one with the most rules. It is the one that tells staff what they may do, what they must not decide, and whom to contact before a conflict reaches the child.

Coordinate Two-Home Household Staff With Divorce Defenders

Nannies, drivers, and house managers can provide valuable continuity across two homes, but only when their instructions reflect the custody order and the parents’ actual decision-making authority. A clear protocol can reduce missed exchanges, conflicting directions, medical confusion, and pressure on staff to take sides.

At Divorce Defenders, Katherine Cohan helps parents examine California custody orders, household staffing arrangements, transportation responsibilities, information sharing, and parenting-time conflicts. Contact the Beverly Hills office to arrange a confidential consultation and develop clearer boundaries for the people helping care for your children.

This article provides general information about California family law and is not legal, employment, or tax advice. Custody orders, protective orders, and household employment arrangements differ. Parents and employers should obtain advice about their own circumstances.

Divorce Defenders

  • PHONE

    +1 310 777 8838

  • HOURS

    Mon-Fri: 8am – 9pm

  • ADDRESS

    9454 Wilshire Blvd. Penthouse Suites Beverly Hills, CA 90212

  • EMAIL

    info@divorcedefenders.com

Links

Location

© 2026 The Law Offices of Katherine Cohan, APLC. All rights reserved.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, and contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Call Now Button